Kavanaugh’s defense attempt is all over again. Mindboggling how, after all those years, that Clinton tried – in vain – to deny admission by pretending that sex can only be intercourse. Is he trying to hide the truth in plain sight? Corel videostudio x6 free download. Let me go over this 20-minute FOX interview, phrase by phrase. His wife opens with a shockingly naive statement.
She never believed the allegations because they are “not consistent” with who Brett is. But isn’t that the definition of? In the new FOX interview, Judge Kavanaugh says that he wants to defend his integrity. Is this a slip of the tongue, Freudian, revealing something? He obviously should clear his name, not his integrity. Is his goal now to show that his denial is not a lie, rather than that he’s never been an abuser? Why insist on being truthful rather than not being a(n attempted) rapist?
He is smart enough to know that honest people lie when the truth is too costly for them. But then, in the next sentence, surprisingly, he uses the word integrity in the second meaning of wholeness.
He wants to defend the integrity of himself and his family. Well, that’s so obvious that one wonders why it needs stating.
Crack do xenobot 10.31 natural reader crack free download cd keygen counter strike 1.3 ranorex 3.3 crack how much is it to fix a cracked ipad touch screen easy homemade mac and cheese crock pot art of war 2 crack tien crack para battlefield vietnam 1.21 blur keygen vitality.
And throughout the interview, he keeps repeating this, only using the word integrity is its meaning of intactness. Does he have trouble stating that he has integrity and does he so try to get a suggestion of credibility? Why not lie about being honest if one is dishonest? I don’t get it. He denies his former roommate’s allegations that assaults on women somehow fit him by referring to women who vouch for him being OK. That is no defense at all against accusations of having acted atypically.
Then he goes on and says literally: “I’ve never sexually assaulted anyone. I did not have sexual intercourse, or anything close to sexual intercourse, in high school or for many years thereafter.” What the f*** (pun intended) does sex have to do with sexual assault?
Sexual violence is a form of violence, not of sexuality. He’s a prominent judge and he doesn’t know that? So far in the interview, he does more damage than good to his case.
He keeps defending himself against allegations of being a serial rapist while he’s actually accused of sexual assault. These are two different things altogether, as I mentioned prominently. He even goes so far as to deny knowledge of student parties where boys and girls seclude themselves to have sex. He had many male and female friends and these friendships were all platonic. I would say that such a denial of sexuality is exactly what contributes to the sex abuse in the Catholic Church. Denial of any loose sexual activity of any students around him sounds fake and unbelievable.